Total Pageviews

Showing posts with label GPS. Show all posts
Showing posts with label GPS. Show all posts

Thursday, December 5, 2013

Senate Bill 57

    Looks like things are going to get tough for those of us that have the habit of going on the run trying to escape The Sex Crime Witch here in California. While a "victim" of Jessica's Law is on parole here in California they are not only forced into homelessness due to residential restrictions, they are also forced to wear a GPS Tracking Shackle locked onto their ankle. Alot of "victims" of Jessica's Law finding life virtually impossible while forced to live on the streets like an animal where their main concern is to where to charge up their GPS Tracking Shackle twice a day decide to cut off the GPS and go into hiding. Who can blame them? I know I've done it before. On October 12, 2013 Gov. Brown signed into law charging those who cut off this barbaric device will now be charged with a felony and given up to 3  years in prison. I swear The Sex Crime Witch Hunt just keeps getting worse and worse with no end in sight. Good time to leave the country if you're able. 

Lawmakers send Gov. Brown bill to ensure mandatory penalties, jail time for paroled sex offenders who remove GPS monitors


September 11, 2013
03-01-13 KGStrap.jpg
Bill strengthens deterrent for sex offender absconders

SACRAMENTO – California Lawmakers today on overwhelmingly bipartisan votes in both the Assembly and Senate  sent Gov. Brown legislation to ensure convicted sex offenders who cut off their ankle-mounted GPS monitors serve the full and maximum parole sentence. 
The proposed law, Senate Bill 57, by Sen. Ted W. Lieu of Torrance, would help ensure paroled sex offenders remain under GPS supervision instead of cutting them off without fear of punishment.

“When sex offenders know that there are little or no repercussions for cutting off their GPS monitoring devices, it’s time to strengthen the deterrent,” Lieu said after morning and late evening votes in the Assembly and Senate, respectively.
 “Real deterrents for sex offenders drastically reduce the likelihood they will commit another crime. SB 57 will give these sex offenders second thoughts about roaming free while on parole.”

Prior to the 2011 public safety realignment, sex offenders and other parolees who breached parole were returned to state prison for up to a year.  However, realignment moved parole violators from state prison to county jails.

By changing where these parole violators are housed, an unintended consequence was created as it relates to GPS monitoring.  Where previously these sex offenders would return to state prison, in some cases they now are being freed within days or even hours because of crowded county jails.

“By lowering the number of sex offenders who cut off their GPS device, we will lower the recidivism rate and less sex offenders will commit a new crime resulting in high prison time,” Lieu said.

As written, SB 57 would:
• Require a sex offender GPS absconder to be sentenced to 180 days and mandate that the sex offender serve the entire parole revocation in county jail.
• Allow county jails to keep track of GPS absconders separately from other parolees.
Following the time served on this new felony, this sex offender will be released again on parole as a sex offender and once again monitored by GPS.

SB 57 is supported by law enforcement and victims’ rights groups, including the Association for Los Angeles Deputy Sheriffs; the California District Attorneys Association; CA Narcotics Officers Association; the California Police Chiefs Association; the City of Los Angeles; the County of Los Angeles; Crime Victims United; Los Angeles County District Attorney’s Office; the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department; the Los Angeles Police Protective League; the L.A. County Probation Officers Union; the Peace Officers Research Association; and the Riverside Sheriff’s Association.
- See more at: http://sd28.senate.ca.gov/news/2013-09-11-lawmakers-send-gov-brown-bill-ensure-mandatory-penalties-jail-time-paroled-sex-offen#sthash.zRIXSubS.dpuf

Wednesday, December 4, 2013

SB 57 Gov. Brown Signs New Law for GPS Tracking Shackles

SB 57

THE COLLEGIAN AT FRESNO STATE: Law punishes sex offenders who cut GPS devices

October 23, 2013
By Crystal Deniz
Gov. Jerry Brown signed a new bill on Oct. 12 that requires sex offenders to spend 180 days in jail for tampering with the GPS device they are fitted with before they are released on parole.

TORRANCE DAILY BREEZE: SEX OFFENDERS - Law sets jail time for ankle bracelet violators

October 13, 2013
A bill signed into law by Gov. Jerry Brown on Saturday will put convicted sex offenders back in jail for a minimum of 180 days if they cut off court-ordered GPS ankle bracelets.

The new law requires that offenders who remove their monitoring devices to serve the additional felony sentence in county jail before returning to parole. 

LOS ANGELES TIMES: Gov. Brown targets sex offenders who remove tracking devices

October 14, 2013
By Patrick McGreevy and Paige St. John

SACRAMENTO -- Sex offenders on parole who remove their electronic tracking bracelets will no longer be eligible for early release from county jail under legislation signed Saturday by Gov. Jerry Brown.
Early release has been common in some counties with their own severe jail crowding problems, but the legislation by state Sen. Ted Lieu (D-Torrance) will mandate that those who remove GPS devices be sentenced to 180 days and require that the sex offender serve the entire parole revocation in county jail.

LOS ANGELES TIMES: New law targets sex offenders who disarm tracking devices

October 12, 2013
By Patrick McGreevy and Paige St. John
CALIFORNIA - Brown zeroes in on crime, justice - Governor signs 21 measures, including one that targets sex offenders who disarm electronic trackers, and vetoes 12
Gov. Jerry Brown cracked down on sex offenders who disarm their electronic trackers while on parole, signing legislation Saturday requiring that they stay in jail once they are caught.

Saturday, June 23, 2012

Friday, June 8, 2012

GPS Shackles - Waste of Taxpayer Monies

This is a must see video on GPS Shackles for CA RSO's on parole, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K6PHlrkphwU&feature=player_embedded#!
www.prop83.org This is a video both explaining and showing how useless GPS ankle bracelets are. California voters were mislead and manipulated into voting for something that doesn't keep anyone safe. The mind of a predator/rapist can't be controlled by watching the location of an offender. They still have the same horrible desires and impulses that caused them to offend in the first place. However, only 3.3% of child offenders (The real reason for the law) ever repeat their actions. The goal should be to make that 0.0% This can't be done with GPS, it can only be done with regular, perhaps lifetime, mental health care. No one likes child molesters. However without understanding how they work, why they do the horrible things they do, all we're doing is throwing money down a hole for a false sense of security.

Friday, June 1, 2012

SC Rules Lifetime GPS Unconstitutional

From: Trial Theory http://www.trialtheory.com/appellate-opinions/state-v-dykes-lifetime-gps-monitoring-is-unconstitutional/

State v. Dykes – lifetime GPS monitoring is unconstitutional

In State v. Dykes, decided May 9, 2012, the South Carolina Supreme Court held that the imposition of lifetime GPS monitoring of convicted sex offenders, without regard to the likelihood of re-offending, violates substantive due process.  The majority opinion finds that persons have a fundamental right to be left alone, and the monitoring requirement under these circumstances fails the strict scrutiny test.  (If the right infringed upon is a “fundamental right,” a higher standard (“strict scrutiny”) is applied to determine if the law at issue is unconstitutional).
The concurring opinion finds that convicted sex offenders do not have a fundamental constitutional right to be left alone; nevertheless, lifetime GPS monitoring without judicial review to determine an individual’s likelihood of re-offending is arbitrary and still fails the lesser, rational basis test.  Further, it violates the right to privacy which is found in the South Carolina Constitution:
I believe the finding of arbitrariness is additionally supported by the South Carolina Constitution, which, unlike the United States Constitution, has an express privacy provision. See S.C. Const. art. I, § 10 (“The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures and unreasonable invasions of privacy shall not be violated . . . .”). While our constitution’s privacy provision does not transform a purported privacy interest into a fundamental right for purposes of applying the strict scrutiny test, I believe it does inform the analysis of whether a state law is arbitrary and lends additional support to the conclusion that section 23-3-540(C) is unconstitutional. Cf. State v. Weaver, 374 S.C. 313, 649 S.E.2d 479 (2007) (holding that by articulating a specific prohibition against unreasonable invasions of privacy, the people of South Carolina have indicated a higher level of privacy protection than the federal Constitution).
It is interesting that the State argued on appeal that the sex offender registry is more invasive than GPS monitoring, and therefore GPS monitoring must be constitutional:
The State argues that the inverse is true and that it is the sex offender registry which is more invasive. In particular, the State points out that the registry provides the public with the offender’s full name, address, and offense history. Furthermore, the registry contains a photograph of the individual in addition to a physical description, complete with a list of tattoos and scars. In contrast, information obtained through satellite monitoring of that individual is limited to only the person’s location and is not available to the public.
So, if in the State’s opinion lifetime registry requirements are more invasive than GPS monitoring, yet GPS monitoring fails not only the rational basis test but also strict scrutiny, depending on which Justice you listen to, what does that say about lifetime registry requirements?
South Carolina has the most oppressive registry requirements in the country – lifetime sex offender registry without regard to the nature of the conviction or likelihood to re-offend.  A person convicted of statutory rape, who had consensual sex with a partner a few years younger than themselves, is treated the same as a person convicted of forcible rape of a child, is treated the same as a drunk convicted of indecent exposure.
And we want all to wear a monitor on their ankle, 24 hours a day, and prevent them from traveling, for the rest of their lives?  I suspect the supporters of the lifetime GPS requirement would just as soon support summary execution if they could color it constitutional.

Sex Offenders - The New Jews in America

 
THE NEW JEWS IN AMERICA
This is the twenty-sixth in a series of articles about Auburn-area homeless people, written by local attorney, author, and Sierra College Instructor, Bob Litchfield

A few days after I interviewed LaRaine Olson, I ran into the young man who offered her some of his groceries while we were talking.

(For more information about LaRaine, see article number twenty-one, called, “From Hells Angel to Homeless Angel.”)

The young man looks to be about twenty years old. But it turns out that he is actually 28. He has been homeless for about two years. Since he is a 290 registered sex offender, we will not use his real name. Instead, we’ll call him Sam.

Young Sam can’t get a job, he is homeless, he wears a GPS ankle monitor, and he is basically ruined for life because of his registry as a sex offender.

I look at him, and I realize that he is about the same age as my own children.

I ask him about his sex offense.

“I’m not a rapist. And I never abducted a child,” he says. “I did something really stupid, back when I was eighteen years old. Now, I can’t get a job, and I can’t find a place to live.”

Sam will almost certainly be on the registered sex offender list for the rest of his life. Once you get on that list, you’re not getting off without a miracle or a governor’s pardon.

Sam says, “So, here I am, camping where ever I can find a place to hide out and camp... until I get discovered camping there, and the police come and run me off.

“I am forced to violate the terms of my probation all the time, because every day, I have to sneak around and find a place to plug in my ankle monitor to re-charge the battery.

“It’s illegal for me to live in a house or an apartment that is anywhere near a school, or a park. And yet, it’s perfectly legal for me to be camped out in the woods near a school or a park. Now...if I was a dangerous sexual predator, (which I am not) where would you rather have me, in a house where you can find me, or camped out somewhere in the woods?”

Sam’s theory as to why he is being kept on the registered sex offender list is that the parole officer’s union is a very powerful California Labor Union, and that as long as there are an abundance of registered sex offenders for the parole officers to monitor, then all of the California parole officers have good job security.

If Sam had a magic wand, and could do or be anything, what would he do? He would go back to when he was just eighteen years old, and undo his crime, so that he wasn’t a registered sex offender any more.

If Sam had a message for the world, what would it be?

“Take people as individuals, and take the time to see who they really are. People are not numbers. People are not statistics.”

Sam has bi-polar disease. He is on medication for his bi-polar disease. But he says that the medication isn’t working very well.

Most of the time, Sam is a pretty cheerful guy, and when he comes around the other homeless people, he makes them laugh, and he brings a lot of happiness.

But on some days, Sam gets pretty depressed about his situation.

I can’t say that I blame him.

At the age of 28, his life is ruined beyond repair.

His lifetime registry as a sex offender is a life sentence to social and economic death.

He is not a rapist, and he is not a child abductor. That means that he is on the list for some lesser, sex-related offense. But that doesn’t stop the general public from lumping him in with the general assumption that everyone on the sex offender registry is a rapist or a child abductor.

Well, they’re not. In fact, if someone would make a count, I’d wager that most of the people on the registered sex offender list are NOT rapists, and are NOT child abductors.

So, what’s wrong with this picture?

Sam, like many other people on the registered sex offender list, is just another notch on the gun of some politically-ambitious deputy district attorney, who is anxious to show a high conviction rate, and hoping one day to be promoted to full District Attorney, or Judge.

If you young deputy district attorneys out there want to know how it works out for you, spiritually, to pursue your ambitions by putting people on a list that ruins their lives, regardless of whether they are true sexual predators or not, check out Judge Deck Diver, up in Nevada County. The Nevada County voters are trying to recall her because they are tired of waiting for her to come back from rehab.

But... on the other hand, given the number of drunken judges that we’ve had on the Nevada and Placer County benches during the past few years, maybe Judge Deck Diver, as the one judge in our area who finally had the courage to check herself into rehab, ought to be given a medal.

My recent experiences with homeless registered sex offenders reminds me of a time when I was a young attorney, doing collection work for banks.

The bankers explained to me that there was a no good, crooked, lying, cheating local business owner who had failed to make his payments. They wanted me to go to court to get the man’s business shut down, and to seize all of the man’s assets.

I filed the necessary court papers to shut down the evil, wicked, mean, bad, and nasty man’s business, and to seize his assets.

Then, I met the man whose life I was helping the bankers to ruin.

The man was NOT evil, wicked, mean, bad, and nasty. In fact, nothing could be farther from the truth about who that man really was.

The man was the owner of “The Little Puffer Billy” Toy Store. He was the sweetest, kindest, most innocent little man I ever met. He was as honest as the day is long. He had probably never cheated anyone in his entire life.

He was simply unable to pay his loan payments because he was the victim of the bad economy of the early eighties and the twenty-one-percent interest rates that came with it.

So, where was the disconnect between the reality of who the toy store owner really was, and the evil man that the bankers had described?

The answer was simple: as human beings, with consciences (yes, even bankers occasionally have consciences), the bankers found it necessary to de-humanize the man, before they could bear the idea of putting the man out of business and seizing all of his assets.

This is what we human beings to do. In order to make it all right for us to hurt somebody, we must first de-humanize them.

We de-humanize our enemies in war, in order to make it all right for us to kill them. That is why we did not kill Germans, we killed Krauts, Huns, or Heinies. We did not kill Japanese, we killed the Japs. We did not kill Vietnamese, we killed Charlie, or the Cong. We do not kill Iraqis or Afghans, we kill the Towel Heads, or the Sand Niggers, or the Terrorists.

This is what we do to make it all right for us to kill, torment, or torture our fellow human beings. We tell ourselves that those people are not really human beings like us. Then, it’s all right for us to beat them, enslave them, lynch them, torture them, or otherwise torment them.

Wouldn’t it be nice if one day, we became awake enough so that it was no longer acceptable for us to de-humanize our fellow human beings?

If we had to recognize everyone as a human being, war and killing and beatings and torture and injustice might have to come to an end.

But in the mean time, we have created a new sub-culture of sub-human beings whom we call “registered sex offenders.”

According to popular belief, registered sex offenders are evil, mean, bad, and nasty sub-humans, because they have done something sexual, like touching their own private parts... something that none of the rest of us have ever done. (In an age where fully fifty percent of all adult males who attend Christian Churches are, according to Dr. James Dobson, addicted to internet pornography.)

Let’s separate this sub-culture of sub-human beings from the rest of us good people by putting them on a bad-people list for the rest of their lives.

Let’s put a special mark upon them, to keep them all separate from the rest of us. Let’s sew a scarlet letter upon their chests, or place an electronic monitor around their ankles, or better yet, let’s just sew a large, black, six-pointed star upon their chests... like the Jews in Nazi Germany.

As a jobless, homeless, separately-marked sub-culture of presumed-to-be sub-humans, the registered sex offenders are, after all, our new American sub-culture of Jews.

Which makes those of us who separated them out and marked them as sub-human the new Nazis.

You may be indignant, at this point, saying to yourself that registered sex offenders are nothing at all like the Jews in Nazi Germany. You argue that the Jews were innocent victims of religious prejudice, while the registered sex offenders are convicted criminals. You say that’s a huge difference. You say that it’s necessary for us to separate the registered sex offenders from our children, in order to protect our children.

You may be right.

But really?

If you believe that it is all right to de-humanize, separate, and mark for like anyone who has ever committed any kind of sex-related crime, then I invite you to go back and review some of the World War II era Nazi propaganda films about why the Jews must be separated from the rest of the German population. According to those films, Jews are dirty, immoral people, who have such unsanitary personal hygiene habits that they have rats running around in their kitchens. According to those films, we must protect our children from being exposed to the filthy habits of the Jews by separating them from the general population.

Not long after the negative propaganda about the Jews began, the roving bands of Nazi vigilante thugs began the random beatings. At first, they only beat up the Jews. But later, they beat up anyone who spoke out against the Nazi political agenda.

Soon, the German people became afraid to speak out against anything, and the rest is ugly history.

So right now, here in Auburn, we have roving bands of vigilante thugs who are beating up registered sex offenders.

Maybe next, the cry will be, “Let’s gather them all up into a single camp.”

Or, “Let’s just gas them all.”

It’s all right. So far, it’s only registered sex offenders who are getting beaten up. And they aren’t really human beings, are they?

Don’t you understand that when we, as a society, make it all right to do this kind of cruelty to anyone in our society, we make it all right to do cruelty to all of us?

The rumor is that some of our local law enforcement officers are participants in the gang of vigilantes who beat up the homeless registered sex offenders.

If that is true, then I can’t help wondering whether or not some of these same law enforcement officers are the ones who assumed that it would be all right to pull one of our local attorneys off of the front porch of his own home, throw him to the ground in front of his terrified wife and children, handcuff him and arrest him.

What were this highly-respected lawyer’s crimes?

First, he was such a devout Christian that he had chosen to home school his children.

This decision created an inconvenience for county employees, who then chose to harass his family repeatedly.

Second, when county officials and law enforcement officers showed up at his home to “inspect” one of his children, the lawyer stood in the doorway of his own home and had the audacity to insist upon his Constitution rights, and asked the law enforcement officers to obtain a warrant before coming into his home.

For these crimes, one of the most highly-respected Christian lawyers in our community was thrown to the ground in front of his family, handcuffed and arrested, and was later prosecuted by our courts for felony interference with the duties of a law enforcement officer.

The poor lawyer had to take the matter all the way up to the Court of Appeals before he was able to find a judge who had any understanding of our Constitution.

But it’s okay. Because that particular lawyer was different from the rest of us.

If he has chosen to keep his children out of the public schools where our insane legislature has just recently decided that we can best protect our children from sexual abuse not just by segregating sex offenders from schools, but also by requiring that all of our children should be taught in school about the wonderfulness of sodomizers who have made great contributions throughout history, well then, that lawyer is so different from the rest of us that he probably isn’t really a human being anyway, is he?

I submit to you that the people in our California legislature are insane.

Here are two items that tend to prove my assertion:

First, the legislators say that we must keep our children safe from sexual deviance by separating out all of the sex offenders, and keeping them far away from schools and parks and children. But the same legislators also pass a law that says that we must teach our children in our public schools about the wonderfulness of homosexuals throughout history.

What happens in that classroom, when the first little Johnny or Sally raises his or her hand and asks the teacher, “But...what is a homosexual?”

What happens is that the teacher ends up being forced to teach our children and our grandchildren in the public schools the details of homosexuality.

And then our children, who experiment with every new thing that they learn about as they are growing up, all have a new toy.

Wow. That’ll protect them.

That’s legislative insanity number one.

Here’s insanity number two: I call it the Jack Black, va-poo-rizor delusion.

A few years ago, comedians Jack Black and Ben Stiller starred in a movie called, “Envy.” In that movie, Jack Black’s character becomes a millionaire when he invents a wonderful new spray that causes dog poop to simply disappear, so that dog owners no longer have to clean up after their dogs. He calls his new invention “va-poo-rizer.”

The only problem with va-poo-rizer is that we discover later in the movie that all of the tons and tons of dog poop that has been “disappeared” by spraying it hasn’t really disappeared at all.

No, no. Dog poop doesn’t just disappear.

As it turns out, all of those tons of dog poop that were sprayed with va-poo-rizer were actually transported to some other place. And that poor place is getting bombarded and buried in tons and tons of dog poop.

What has that got to do with our State Legislators? Well, our legislators seem to believe that if we just spray the words “registered sex offender” on anyone who commits any crime that is even remotely related to human sexuality, then those people will be separated from our general population, and they will just disappear... like spraying those people with the sex offender’s version of va-poo-rizer.

Well, guess what? Registered sex offenders don’t just disappear.

They have to end up somewhere, jobless and homeless and branded for life.

Right now, it appears that an extraordinarily large number of them are ending up being dumped here in Auburn.

So, if homeless registered sex offenders are the new American version of the Jews, it appears that Auburn is the new Polish Ghetto.

We have so many homeless registered sex offenders here in the Auburn area that it is even worrisome to the other local homeless people.

The local homeless people have at least three different theories as to why there are so many registered sex offenders in the Auburn area.

The first theory is that in Placer County, there used to be two different parole offices, with one parole office down in Roseville, and the other parole office here in Auburn. But now, because of budget cut-backs, the Roseville parole office has been closed.

So, all of the convicted criminals who used to get paroled in Roseville are now getting paroled in Auburn. That includes all of the registered sex offenders from the much larger City of Roseville.

There appears to be some truth to that rumor.

The second rumor is that because of the new law which requires a registered sex offender to be paroled a minimum number of miles away from his or her victim, registered sex offenders from all of the major metropolitan areas have to be paroled some place other than the big cities where they were arrested.

So, where are all of these big city sex offenders getting sent? Some of them are getting sent here.

Is there any truth to this rumor? Well, the registered sex offender that I called Ernie in two of my earlier articles was arrested and convicted of his sex crime in Modesto. But he was paroled here in Auburn. According to one source, we are paroling registered sex offenders here in Auburn who are from as far away as Arizona.

The third rumor is that there is big money involved in the manufacture and sale of the ankle monitoring devices, and that Placer County has received some kind of big-money government grant to be one of the counties that monitors registered sex offenders.

I have not been able to ascertain whether or not there is any truth to that rumor.

But I do think that the people of Auburn would like to know how much truth there is to any and all three of these rumors.

Maybe instead of forming roving bands of vigilantes, and beating people up, some of you ought to write letters to your elected officials, during this election year, and ask a few very specific questions about why there are so many homeless registered sex offenders here in the Auburn area.

You might want to send some of those letters to the elected Placer County officials who live in big, expensive houses down in Granite Bay.

I have a not-very-funny, tongue-in-cheek theory of my own to add to the list. We have known for quite some time now that our neighboring county, Nevada County, has the highest per capital number of registered sex offenders in the State. Maybe now, Nevada County is full up, and having dumped as many registered sex offenders as the State can possibly dump into Nevada County, they’ve simply started dumping them into Placer County.

Va-poo-rizer.

It makes sense to our State Legislature.

No one at the State Legislature will ever ask for my opinion with regard to the registered sex offender list, but here are my two suggestions for making the list more humane:

First, let’s change to law so that the list is limited to no one other than actual rapists and actual child abductors.

Second, since being placed on the registered sex offender list is tantamount to being given a life sentence of social and economic death, let’s treat registry on that list somewhat similar to the way that we treat death sentences in this State.

Every time that a court in this State enters a death sentence, there is an automatic appeal. This is done to ensure that we do not execute any innocent man or woman.

Let’s change the sex offender registry process so that every time someone is put onto that list, that person gets an automatic appeal, so that some higher court or some higher authority makes a determination that this person really is a threat to the safety of others, and ought to be included on this list. That way, we register the real sexual predators, but we do it for reasons that truly protect the public, and not just to put another notch on the gun of some politically-ambitious deputy district attorney.

You say that you don’t want to spend that much for the State’s money on expensive court appeals? Fine. Then instead of having the automatic appeal go to a higher court, lets have the appeal go to a panel of appointed citizens whose only job is to determine whether or not each person who has been placed on this social and economic death list is a real danger to society or not.

And let’s finish by talking about the cost. Right now, there are more than 63,000 people on California’s registered sex offender list. Of those 63,000 people on the list, only about 33,500 are able to show any kind of home address, which would indicate that the rest of the people (about 29,500 people) on the list are currently homeless, and... against their wishes, jobless.

For every homeless person in the State of California, it costs the California tax payer about $40,000 a year in all of the services required to care for, to police, and to clean up after the homeless. That’s 29,500 people whom we have artificially created as homeless, at $40,000 per person. Which means that just in the homelessness costs, the California registered sex offender list is costing us $1,180,000,000 per year.

I don’t mind paying over a billion dollars a year to keep our children safe from real sexual predators. But I’m not quite that excited about paying over a billion dollars a year to keep my children safe from assorted flashers, Utah Congressmen, and Secret Service Agents. (And of the latter, anybody want to take any bets as to how many of them will actually make it onto the list?)

Wednesday, May 30, 2012

S.C. SupremeCourt Declares Lifetime GPS Unconstitutional

From: http://sentencing.typepad.com/sentencing_law_and_policy/2012/05/south-carolina-supreme-court-declares-lifetime-sex-offender-gps-tracking-unconstitutional-on-various.html

South Carolina Supreme Court declares lifetime sex offender GPS tracking unconstitutional on various grounds

The South Carolina Supreme Court has a very interesting (and seemingly ground-breaking) constitutional ruling concerning GPS tracking of a sex offender.  The ruling in SC v. Dykes, No. 27124 (S.C. May 9, 2012) (available here), is a bit hard to figure out: the first opinion seems to announce the opinion for the court, but then a footnote at the state of Justice Hearn's opinion states that "[b]ecause a majority of the Court has joined the separate concurring opinion of Justice Kittredge, his concurrence is now the controlling opinion in this case." I will quote the first paragraph from both opinions in the case, because they both are noteworthy, starting here with the opinion of Justice Hearn:
Jennifer Rayanne Dykes appeals the circuit court's order that she be subject to satellite monitoring for the rest of her natural life pursuant to Section 23-3-540(C) of the South Carolina Code (Supp. 2010). She lodges five constitutional challenges to this statute: it violates her substantive due process rights, her right to procedural due process, the Ex Post Facto clause, the Equal Protection Clause, and her right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures. We hold the mandatory imposition of lifetime satellite monitoring violates Dykes' substantive due process rights and reverse and remand for further proceedings.
The very lengthy opinion by Justice Hearn, which apparently garnered only two (of the five) votes on the court, is thereafter followed by a shorter opinion by Justice Kittredge which starts this way:
I concur in result. I commend my learned colleague for her scholarly research, and I agree with the majority's general proposition that persons have a fundamental right "to be let alone."  But I respectfully disagree that Appellant, as a convicted child sex offender, possesses a right that is fundamental in the constitutional sense.  I do not view Appellant's purported right as fundamental.  I would find Appellant possesses a liberty interest entitled to constitutional protection, for all persons most assuredly have a liberty interest to be free from unreasonable governmental interference.  I would find that the challenged mandatory lifetime, non-reviewable satellite monitoring provision in section 23-3-540(C) is arbitrary and fails the minimal rational relationship test.
Long story short, it appears that all members of the South Carolina Supreme Court have concluded that the mandatory lifetime satellite monitoring now required by stature in South Carolina for sex offender Jennifer Rayanne Dykes is unconstitutional.  (I mention the full name of the defendant in this case because I cannot help but wonder, yet again, if the defendant's gender may have played at least an unconscious role in this notable outcome.  I do not think it is implausible to at least suspect this case might well have come out another way if the the defendant was named Johnny Rex Dykes.)
I have not kept count of how many states are like South Carolina in requiring lifetime GPS monitoring of many sex offenders, but I am pretty sure this ruling could (and should?) have ripple effects in at least a few other jurisdictions.  I am also sure that both constitutional scholars and those interested in the intersection of modern technology and criminal justice doctrines ought to check out the Dykes opinions.

Tuesday, May 29, 2012

CA Paroles Get New GPS Shackles

CA Parolees have been outfitted with new GPS Shackles. You can believe that someone, somewhere in the CA "Just Us" got a big payday. As we know, The Sex Crime Witch Hunt is all about money. Here's an article about it - http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/43186851/ns/us_news-crime_and_courts/t/california-change-sex-offender-tracking/

Friday, April 13, 2012

Torturing CA's Homeless SO's


TORTURING AUBURN’S HOMELESS SEX OFFENDERS - A GREAT IDEA?


This is the fourteenth article in a series of articles written to promote the April 14th, 2012, charity showing of local film maker and Placer High School Graduate Ryan Frew’s documentary film about the homeless in Auburn, called, “Life is Mandatory.” The film will be shown at the State Theater in Auburn. The funds raised will be used to assist Auburn Area Homeless People. Written by local attorney, author, and Instructor at Sierra College, Bob Litchfield.

There will be no photographs of the two men I interviewed to write this article.
Nor will I publish their real names.
I made this decision to protect these homeless men, as they walk around Auburn.
We’ll call one of them Jack, and the other one Ernie.
Jack is a tall, Caucasian male, a bit on the pudgy side, wearing glasses, and looking a lot like your average businessman. He walks with a cane, because of a bad knee. His clothing is clean, and his personal appearance is much neater than that of most other homeless men I have met.
His friend, Ernie, is also very clean. Ernie is a fairly short, stocky black man. He is a good speaker. He also walks with a cane.
I was searching for homeless women or families to interview when I ran into Jack and Ernie. They heard that I was interviewing homeless people, and they sought me out. They are hoping that someone will advocate for their unique, and dire situation.
Jack and Ernie both wear ankle monitors. Both of them have recently been released from prison, and both are registered sex offenders... what they call “290 offenders.”
They are both homeless because our laws made them that way.
Both men were dumped here in Placer County on parole, after they got out of prison for sex offenses.
Neither one of them have any family or friends here.
They have no prospects of employment here.
Nor is there any shelter of any kind in this area that will take them in. Even the local Christian Program, The Gathering In, will not take them, because they are registered sex offenders.
But the conditions of Jack’s and Ernie’s parole require that they both stay here in the Auburn area for the next three to four years.
During all of that time, both men must wear an ankle monitor, which must be plugged in and recharged every day.
But these men do not have any home, any shelter, or even any place where they can go to plug in their ankle monitors to re-charge them.
Ernie says that this places the men in a position where they are forced by the justice system of break the law again, because one of the only ways that they can get their ankle monitors re-charged is to sneak into some commercial establishment and plug in, thereby committing the crime of stealing electricity (potentially a commercial burglary).
Jack is a tile setter by trade, and is originally from Arizona. He was here in Auburn when he committed his offense. But he would like to go back to Arizona, to be near his family. But the prison system dumped him here to serve his four years of parole. There is a program where the States of California and Arizona can swap former prisoners on parole, but Jack wasn’t even told where he was going to be paroled until he was freed.
Ernie used to work as a Chef at a restaurant in the Grand Canyon. He was in Modesto when he committed his offense. He was dumped here in Placer County to serve his parole because of a new law that requires sex offenders to be paroled a certain distance away from their victims.
I should point out that not everyone you might encounter in the Auburn area who is wearing an ankle monitor is a sex offender or a movie star. The justice system now uses ankle bracelets to monitor a lot of different kinds of offenders, because it is cheaper than feeding them in jail.
Jack and Ernie will have to wear their ankle bracelets all day, every day, for the next three or four years. It is possible to shower with the ankle monitor on, but the device cannot be submerged. Which means that for the next four years, neither one of these two men will ever be able to go for a swim, or to get into a bath.
Both men are on pain medications, which they are able to get from county health, and both are also on psychiatric medications.
The fact that they were homeless men adrift in Auburn, and that they are on psychiatric medications worried me a great deal, at first. Because I have been told by other local experts on homelessness that the homeless people in the Auburn area who are on psychiatric medications are only able to get examined and get their psychiatric medications adjusted once every six months.
But the medication situation for homeless sex offenders is not quite that perilous.
One of the men tells me that his psychiatric medication is for depression. He also tells me that they do not get their psychiatric medications through county health, but rather, through their parole officers and the parole system. Through the parole system, they are able to get their medications checked once every two months.
Jack was in prison for twelve years. Ernie was in prison for a little over five years.
Jack has been here in Auburn, homeless, for about two months. Ernie has been here, homeless, for about a year now.
Jack described his arrival in Auburn, and their current situation. “I arrived in Auburn, and by the time that they processed me out of the jail, it was about 3:00 P.M. They put on my ankle monitor and told me that it had to be recharged every day. They gave me $200, and told me to go to the County Welcome Center, which is one of the only places in Auburn where there are services available for homeless people.
“But the Welcome Center closes at 4:00 P.M. So, I got there just barely in time to find out anything. I didn’t know where I could go to get shelter, where I could go to get food. I didn’t even know where I could go to re-charge my ankle bracelet.
“I was at least able to get a sleeping bag. And someone told me about a relatively safe spot where I could sleep outside for the night. So, I slept outside that first night.
“The next day, I ran into Ernie, and he showed me some of the ropes with regard to how to survive on the streets as a homeless registered sex offender.”
Jack and Ernie usually do not camp anywhere near the other homeless men, because neither one of them do drugs or alcohol, and they do not want to be near the problems caused by drugs and alcohol. But they do have to camp outside every day, because there is no shelter, anywhere in Placer County, that will take in a registered sex offender.
Nor is there any campground, nor any piece of ground, anywhere in the Auburn area, where it is permissible for homeless people to camp. So, homeless people are forced to sneak around and camp at any remote location where they can get away with it, until the police come and roust them out of that spot, and they move somewhere else.
Ankle monitors or not, this wandering camping life does not strike me as a very good way to monitor registered sex offenders.
Jack says that he is disabled, because of his knee and back injuries. But he is not receiving disability. He is in the process of making application for disability. But in the mean time, he has no income at all.
Ernie has peripheral artery disease in his right leg, and has had two stints put in. He applied for disability, but his claim was rejected. Right now, he is attempting to appeal his disability claim. Until then, he is homeless and without income. He sleeps outside, on the ground, every night, in a tent, with two stints in his leg.
I ask Jack what message he would like to send to the world.
Jack says, “Get to know a person before you judge them for their past, because people do change.” Earlier, Jack had assured me that he was not the same person as the man who went to prison twelve years earlier.
I want to believe him. But I have heard all of the same news stories, television stories, and propaganda that you have heard, to the effect that sex offenders, particularly sexual predators, never really change, and that they will be repeat offenders for life.
I ask Jack what his response is to that general belief.
Jack tells me that those sex offenders whom you see walking free on the streets are very unlikely to be repeat offenders.
He says that before he was released, he had to be examined and pass written reports made by four different psychiatrists.
He says that sex offenders who cannot pass that kind of rigorous testing simply no longer get released. He says that this is especially true after the Garrido case.
Who can say for sure how accurate that information is?
Certainly not me.
But I do know that the registered sex offender list has been grossly abused by our justice system, and that there are men on the registered sex offender list who have nothing whatsoever to do with being sexual predators, and that those men’s lives are ruined.
Should a twenty-year-old boy who slept with his seventeen-year-old girlfriend be registered on the same list with rapists and child molesters?
Should the youth pastor of a church who gets seduced by a troubled seventeen-year-old girl be registered on the same list with rapists and child molesters?
Should a father who takes a troubled sixteen-year-old foster child into his home, and ends up being seduced by her be on the same list with rapists and child molesters?
Maybe you think so. There is certainly a wide berth for disagreement on these kinds of emotional hot-button issues.
I have been told that a man can end up being placed on the registered sex offender list for just for stopping by the side of the road to urinate, and thereby exposing himself.
If we are going to make registered sex offenders out of every person who has ever committed some form of sexual indiscretion, and put ankle bracelets on them all, then let’s start with one of our past foothills district attorneys, or two or three of our local judges, or maybe the state legislators who used to sit with lobbyists at the bar in downtown Sacramento where the legislators were encouraged to pick out the prostitutes they liked from those swimming nude in the glass-walled swimming pool behind the bar... services happily paid for by the lobbyists.
Legislators aside, I have known many a good man and good woman during my lifetime who had his or her life ruined by a moment of sexual indiscretion. But we did not register all of them as sex offenders.
Back when we were kids in school, we were taught how barbaric it was that our Puritan ancestors would force an adulteress to wear a large scarlet letter “A” on her clothing.
We were also taught, and saw in our annual viewing of the movie about Moses, that it was barbaric to create a class of people who were outcasts from society because they were afflicted with leprosy.
We were taught that it was barbaric, and totally un-American for people in India to separate themselves into a caste system that included one class of people who were called the “untouchables.”
But now, when vengeance and punishment and sex is involved, Americans don’t seem to have any problem at all with creating a group of Americans whom we shall call “registered sex offenders,” and who shall be treated as outcasts, lepers, untouchables, and who shall wear the scarlet letter of the ankle monitor, and whose names shall be posted on the internet.
Do I exaggerate about these people being outcasts and untouchables?
Jack and Ernie tell me that there is not one single shelter in Placer County that will take them in, even for one night.
And remember that they are not permitted to leave Placer County.
They do not have a place to plug in their ankle monitors, which must be recharged every day.
Even if Jack and Ernie did have any money, which they do not, there is only one place that they know of, in all of Placer County, that is even willing to rent a room to them.
The cost of renting a room at that one place is $500 per person per month.
If Jack or Ernie ever do succeed in getting disability payments, those payments will be about $900 a month. So, more than half of their income would go to rent a room at the one place in Placer County that is willing to rent them a room.
In the mean time, they sleep in a tent... even on a cold day when the rain is pouring down in buckets, like it is today.
Last night, as I lay in my warm, dry bed, the rain beat down on the roof of my home like a constant drumming. I could not sleep. I laid there, thinking about the fact that Jack and Ernie were out there, somewhere, trying to sleep in a soggy tent.
There was no room at the Inn for them. There was not even an Inn available that would accept them.
We created this situation, with our own, well-intentioned laws.
But if we were to leave our dogs, our horses, or even our livestock out in weather like this with no shelter whatsoever, someone from the humane society or animal control would probably have us arrested.
We treat our dogs and our livestock better than we treat these human beings whom we have labeled as “registered sex offenders.”
Maybe, like me, you are one of those vindictive people who are thinking, or who have thought at some time or other in the past, “Good. Let these registered sex offenders suffer. Let’s punish them even more. They are not human beings like us. They are animals.”
Well, fine.
You can explain that kind of no-mercy reasoning to Jesus, when you finally meet Him face-to-face.
But in the mean time, I think that what we need here are a few, extraordinary Christians who have enough grace to get together and figure out some safe way that we can get Auburn’s homeless registered sex offenders some shelter from the rain.
This is a problem that is too big, and too complicated, for one person to solve by himself.

Saturday, February 25, 2012

CDCR's Sex Offender Information

Sex Offender Information Overview

GPS Monitor being recharged.
California leads the nation in tracking sex offenders with Global Positioning Technology. California has more than 6,600 sex offenders equipped with GPS (all active sex offender parolee in the community) California's total GPS units more than triples the nation's second leading state, Florida which has a total of 1,800 units.
3 min video video >
Click to view Latest Jessica's Law Statistics
Since the passage of Jessica's Law in 2006, the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) has been working to aggressively enforce new residency restrictions, and to utilize new technology - such as Global Positioning System (GPS) - to monitor sex offenders more closely and efficiently. California's parole division has made it a priority to work with local law enforcement to implement Jessica's Law, better monitor sex offenders released from prison and ensure public safety.
Of the almost 92,000 sex offenders statewide, CDCR is only responsible for a little more than 11% (10,781).
This site is dedicated to providing the latest news and information on sex offenders as well as information on collaborative efforts between CDCR and other agencies dedicated to protecting public safety.
CDCR Strictly enforces Jessica's Law to keep sex offenders who are on parole from living within 2,000 feet of schools and parks.

Jessica's Law vs Megan's Law

With the highest population of sex offenders in the nation, California has enacted historic new laws pertaining to sex offenders. However, there still remains much confusion on the intent and purposes of these new laws. The recent passage of Jessica's Law has often been confused with a separate law known as Megan's Law. Here are some quick facts which may help in distinguishing these two landmark measures:
click for Jessica's Law Statistics
Jessica's Law deals with proximity and tracking - Proposition 83, also known as Jessica's Law, was passed by California voters on Nov. 7, 2006. It enhances the state's ability to detect, track and apprehend sexual offenders. Jessica's Law prohibits sex offenders that are released from prison to live within 2,000 feet of parks and schools, as well as other restrictions. Click here to learn more about Jessica's Law
Megan's Law addresses registration requirements - Expanded access was given final passage by the Legislature on August 24, 2004 was signed by the Governor on Sept. 24, 2004. The law allowed the public to access information on sex offenders required to register with local law enforcement. Click here to get more information on Megan's Law and to access the state database
View Sex Offender Safety Tips

How GPS Monitoring Works

How GPS Monitoring Works

GPS around a globeGlobal Positioning System (GPS) monitoring works due to the triangulation of satellites orbiting the earth. Twenty-four satellites are used in all.
To "triangulate" means that a GPS receiver measures distance using the travel time of radio signals. When a user's GPS ankle unit reads the signals sent to it by the satellites, these signals can provide information as to the wearer's location, speed of movement and direction of movement.


GPS basic system

Active VS Passive GPS Measuring

GPS deviceActive GPS transmits its location at near real-time intervals and can include immediate alert notifications.
Passive GPS transmits its location at set intervals and alert notifications are usually received the next day.

Use of GPS Data

GPS overall system

Thursday, December 1, 2011

Global Conglomerate 3M and GPS Shackles

   This horrid GPS Shackle I have locked on my ankle was made by a company called Pro-Tech which has recently been purchased by the global conglomerate 3M which knows a money maker when It sees one. GPS Shackles for everyone! Gee, we sure will be safe then and just think of all the jobs GPS Shackles provide. So what that these barbaric devices do nothing to protect the public. Big deal that hundreds of million of taxpayer dollars are totally wasted on these GPS Balls and Chains every year. Doesn't matter that Law Enforcement time and energy is taken up by tracking GPS Shackles. 3M is racking in hundreds of millions !!! That's all that matters ! You can bet that 3M will be spending millions on lobbyists and propaganda to promote their new "product". An excellent article in Mother Jones Magazine (a magazine I subscribed to in prison) was recently published on how Hi-Tech Company's are making a killing on GPS for sex offenders. Here's a link to It:


 http://motherjones.com/politics/2011/11/jessicas-law-surveillance-corporations


   As with alot about The Sex Crime Witch Hunt, It all boils down to money. Follow the money and you'll see why GPS Shackles have become so popular. It needs to be exposed now!!!

Here's the link to 3M, their new product, and "About Us"

 http://solutions.3m.com/wps/portal/3M/en_US/ElectronicMonitoring/?WT.mc_id=www.3m.com/electronicmonitoring

About Us

3M Electronic Monitoring banner
The specific needs and considerations of remote offender monitoring programs within the criminal justice industry have always been the focal point of 3M Electronic Monitoring’s operations. This position has enabled 3M Electronic Monitoring to accumulate a wealth of technical and industry expertise, covering the full spectrum of offender monitoring and tracking product solutions and technologies. The majority of 3M Electronic Monitoring’s financial and human resources are dedicated to customer support, design, engineering and development activities, ensuring delivery of the best available monitoring technology solutions for our customers. This flexible, customer-oriented approach to the design process and service delivery enables 3M Electronic Monitoring to provide high quality products and services.
With a presence in more than 25 countries, 3M Electronic Monitoring is a leading global provider of presence and location verification technologies for the criminal justice industry. We offer a complete suite of proprietary products and services. Our solutions can be customized, and are based upon a full-featured, integrated platform that is scalable and highly flexible to meet each organization’s unique needs now and in the future. As an industry innovator, 3M Electronic Monitoring offers technologies to support law enforcement, corrections, and security operations.

Monday, November 28, 2011

High Tech Companies Making Big Bucks Off RSO's

State laws that keep a close eye on sex offenders are supposed to protect kids. Are they also meant to enrich high-tech tracking companies?

In February 2005, nine-year-old Jessica Lunsford was kidnapped, raped, and buried alive by a twice-convicted sex offender who lived a few hundred feet from her home in Homosassa, Florida. The crime horrified Floridians, and a little more than two months later, then-Gov. Jeb Bush signed the Jessica Lunsford Act, which mandated a minimum sentence of 25 years for first-time sex offenders who target children under 12 and life sentences for recidivists. It also required some released sex offenders to wear GPS tracking devices for the rest of their lives.
Almost immediately, there were calls for similar legislation across the country. Lunsford's father, Mark, joined the campaign, appearing on Oprah and Larry King Live and winning support from high-profile figures such as Bill O'Reilly, who declared, "This is literally a life-and-death battle to save our youngest and most vulnerable citizens from abuse, torture, and murder." In addition to Florida, 44 other states have since passed what's become known as Jessica's Law (PDF). The laws vary slightly state by state, but all mandate stiff sentences; 39 permit electronic monitoring for released offenders (of those, 24 authorize GPS monitoring). "Instead of them stalking our children, let's stalk them," Lunsford said at a 2006 event promoting the law in California.The push to implement Jessica's Law in all 50 states has been spearheaded by Stop Child Predators, a nonprofit formed in 2005. The group's determination to crack down on criminals who prey on kids is unquestionable. But there is another group with an interest in its work: GPS and tracking companies, which stand to gain as SCP's model legislation spreads. There are an estimated 736,000 registered offenders out there (PDF); satellite tracking equipment costs anywhere from $15 to $20 per person per day (an expense often paid by parolees). One of SCP's official corporate partners is Omnilink Systems, a major vendor of "offender monitoring" devices. SCP president Stacie Rumenap is a member of Omnilink's advisory board. A company brochure quotes her as saying SCP is "proud to support the use of" Omnilink's technology. The company has not said how many states it has sex offender monitoring contracts with.
In 2009, Lunsford, who serves as the chairman of SCP's advisory board, took a $100,000-a-year consulting job with Technology Investors, a Florida firm that creates databases to keep track of sex offenders. He told the St. Petersburg Times that the company's founder, data-mining maven Hank Asher, suggested that he shut down his own nonprofit, the Jessica Marie Lunsford Foundation, so he could "focus on legislation."
There is a universal "desire to keep kids safe," Rumenap notes. She downplays the idea that SCP's work is intended to benefit its corporate supporters. "This is an easy issue for companies to get behind," she says. "Who wants to argue against it?" A petite and charismatic blonde who has served as the deputy director of the American Conservative Union and director of the Conservative Political Action Conference, Rumenap is also the director of corporate relations at the Mercatus Center, a think tank funded by conservative billionaire Charles Koch.
SCP also has close ties the American Legislative Exchange Council, a low-profile yet influential clearinghouse of pro-business state legislation. SCP is an ALEC member, and ALEC adopted its template for a sex offender bill in 2006. Rumenap says that the "access to" legislators that ALEC provides has been "extremely" helpful in getting Jessica's Law into wider circulation. Since April, she has been the co-chair of ALEC's Public Safety and Elections Task Force, which oversees criminal legislation, including a bill that would require parolees and defendants out on bail to submit to GPS monitoring. It would also require ex-cons to "pursue specified education courses," a potential windfall for student loan companies and for-profit colleges.
Those companies, as it turns out, are also well represented in Rumenap's organization: SCP was founded by three executives from the College Loan Corporation, another of its corporate partners. Its board includes the CLC's chief marketing officer and a top lobbyist for the Apollo Group, the parent company of the University of Phoenix.
"I don't doubt that Stop Child Predators is genuinely interested in stopping child predators," says Lisa Graves, executive director of the Center for Media and Democracy, which recently published a cache of more than 800 pieces (PDF) of cookie-cutter legislation promoted by ALEC. No matter how laudable a bill may be, she says, the public has a right to know whether it will financially benefit a particular company. "If people knew that there was a profit motive behind it, they might have greater skepticism about whether this is the best solution or not."
Kate Sheppard covers energy and environmental politics in Mother Jones' Washington bureau. For more of her stories, click here. She Tweets here. Get Kate Sheppard's RSS feed.

Sunday, July 24, 2011

The Bay Area and GPS for RSO's

If you live in The Bay Areaand what to know about GPS Tracking Devices for RSO's on parole, check out this site  http://informant.kalwnews.org/tag/gps/

Cops, courts and communities in the Bay Area.

 ABOUT THIS SITE

In recent years, San Francisco and Oakland have played host to public safety tragedies that have stoked local controversy and national attention. Often lost in the frenzy are the voices of those trying to chart a better future for our community. The Informant - a product of KALW News in San Francisco - will chronicle this battle for a safer Bay Area. Led by reporters Rina Palta and Ali Winston, we'll go deep into cops, courts and communities, giving you informed, intelligent, community-oriented news, conversation and analysis.

Sunday, July 17, 2011

Cell Phone GPS Tracking

Find Out Your Husband through Cell Phone Tracking

Do you think your husband is lying to you?  Are you afraid that your husband is having an affair, or is doing something he knows you wouldn’t approve of?  Do you wish you could find out where he’s really going when he tells you he’s working late?  Do you wish you could find out just using his cell phone, so he wouldn’t know you were checking up on him?  Cell phone tracking is your answer!
Cell phone tracking software is actually one of the easiest ways to find out what your husband is really up to when he says he’s at work or out with his friends and you don’t believe him.   For one, you don’t have to leave your house to see if he’s lying.   Two, he won’t catch you checking up on him as long as you hide the software on your computer.   And three, it costs less than a private investigator, so if you find out he is telling you the truth, you aren’t wasting your money.
How does cell phone tracking work?  Basically, you need to find a phone tracing software that you can install on your husband’s phone.   It will then send information to your computer, where you can log in and see what he’s doing.   You can get information immediately, every time he uses his phone.
Phone tracking software will give you GPS information on your husband’s location.   You can see exactly where he is at any given time, as long as he has his phone on him.   Plus the cell phone tracking software will give you much more information too.   You can find out all sorts of information about his phone usage.   You can see the numbers he calls, how long he talks to the person, and the name of the person if it’s stored in his phone contacts.   You can even see how many texts he sends to the person, and what they say.   You can get all of this with just the software, and you can get it instantly, as soon as it happens.
If you want instant, concrete proof that your husband is lying to you, using phone tracking software will help you.   And if you find out that your husband isn’t lying, and he really is working until 11 pm every night, then you can rest easy.   He will never have to know you didn’t believe him.