Total Pageviews

Friday, March 9, 2012

CA Innocence Projects

From: The Innocence Network

http://www.innocencenetwork.org/

CALIFORNIA

California Innocence Project
California Western School of Law
Institute for Criminal Defense Advocacy
225 Cedar Street
San Diego, CA 92101
Phone: 619-525-1485
Fax: 619-615-1443
Cases Accepted:
  • DNA and non-DNA cases
  • cases from Southern California: Imperial Co., Kern Co., Los Angeles Co., Orange Co., Riverside Co., San Bernardino Co., San Diego Co., San Luis Obispo Co., Santa Barbara Co., and Ventura Co.
  • sentence of more than 3 years
  • will consult

Northern California Innocence Project
Santa Clara University School of Law
500 El Camino Real
Santa Clara, CA 95053-0422
Phone: 408-554-1945
Cases Accepted:
  • DNA and non-DNA
  • Northern California cases only
  • generally at least 3 years left on sentence
  • will consult with an attorney

Wednesday, March 7, 2012

The Sad State of CA's Mailrooms

From: Prison Movement
http://prisonmovement.wordpress.com/

Strange Tides in the Mailroom at CCWF

Written under duress by Johnny Street
The process of inmates being rehabilitated is a many splendored one. No system has ever been imposed or thought of that can change a detriment of humanity into an asset, and to think that it would is beyond ridiculous. We are no stranger to an event happening and then days later find out what is really behind something, and usually it is a situation more disgusting than the initial one itself. Such is the case at Central California Women’s Facility in Chowchilla, California- the largest women’s prison in the world. Internal Affairs (the cops who watch the cops) busted two officers for smuggling drugs, tobacco, contraband, and even a few cell phones into the prison were busted in January, 2012. This information came from a source close to such things, and this person is also an inmate.
No press was ever informed of this, and for good reason. California is broke. Beyond broke. It seems every attempt at solving our debt to banks is aimed at anything that is a tax paying blood bleeding citizen- except if you’re rich. There wasn’t even an attempt at a cover-up because the world by and large could give a shit less about what goes in prisons. They are menacing warehouses for the ones to dangerous to be seen with the likes of us, so as long as they are on the other side of the fence, this is safety enough for most. But that is neither here nor there in its relevancy of this article. A plan to decrease spending among the largest government funded industry in California has meant some lay-offs, decrease in pay and allowed hours of overtime, and cutting of rehabilitative programs for inmates. Since the canning of the two officers, there have been no attempts at hiring other guards to screen the mail. CCWF gets an average of 20,000 pieces of inmate mail a week, and with only two guards available to screen such a huge load, it is only natural that mail will be delivered far beyond its intended read date. During the Christmas season, mail is at its crux in volume, and this is understandable. Now, being that we are in March, mail is far worse than anything the holiday influx could make. The last piece of mail that was delivered to the inmate I wrote to was post marked January 10, 2012 and it arrived three days ago. Today is March 5.
Mail, is at times the only positive thing that happens for inmates subjugated in a system that neither corrects, nor rehabilitates. It allows the recipient of such things a chance to read of the world they are missing out on, if only for 5 minutes. Of course such aspects of humanity only cost money in the immediate way of handling things. Warden D.K. Johnson is the typical model of an old hack and could care less. She like, the last 8 Wardens at the prison have only worked there less than a year and do so with the aim of retiring on a Warden’s pension. Inmate rehabilitation means as much to her and all the other hacks as tossing a wrapper in the trash. I know this because she hung up on me when I asked what is being done about the mail, and why haven’t you made an effort to alleviate this? While programs and staff get cut there, it is the inmates who suffer the most. But this is not just a case of being short staffed and work not getting done in a timely way. No, the underlying tones are more sinister than the event itself.
Inmates have been filing official documented complaints en masse about this issue. But the CCPOA wants this to be solved for one reason- money. They are using this insult to the badge as a means to allocate more funds, and the means of this is for inmates to sue the CDCR, and create a stir of it in court. The inmates bring the issue to trial, a judge will rule on it, and most likely deem this delay in mail absurd, and then allocate money for the CCPOA to get more staff and allot more overtime. I am unclear if the two officers who were cited for introduction of contraband into a prison were ever arrested or face criminal charges. I would hope they are, but it would not be surprising if they were just let go- with some sort of severance to boot. Honestly, I don’t care how the forward thinkers in Sacramento waste our money at this point. They’ve had so many blunders that I am immune to the stupidity of them now. Every decision that’s been made since the majority of America voted a Bush into the White House has been a way to save money, spend less, and also how to give the elite (the job creators) the means to employ/enslave a desperate public teetering on the brink depravity. I should care, but I don’t anymore. I can’t think of one thing that the tax I pay on gas, cigarettes, food, income or anything else go to something that our society needs, so for that matter, the pigs won- Sellah, you assholes. Sure we can write the Warden or our congressman but they won’t give a damn either. California is now a Corporatocracy, every joker who wears an expensive suit and is expert at answering questions with half truths and diverting blame can be a sock-puppet for the thousands of entities who have the same rights as living breathing people, and be put into positions to make important decisions. And all the while we wonder why all those 99%ers do what they do. Why would the sock puppets give a damn about people who neither contribute to that system, much less oppose it? The oppressed do, and of course the only ones who do hold the keys to this vehicle don’t find such things important. All the while they try to solve a debt and keep them and their contributors rich, it is the incarcerated who feel this as well. People continue to remain jobless, joblessness leads to desperation. Desperation many times leads to committing a crime against the state- which will make you part of the business that is the CDCR. Somehow there is always money to lock you away, yet never enough to run a prison efficiently.

Dangers of SO Residential Restrictions

THE ANGRY OFFENDER

 http://angryoffender.com/

The Dangers of Sex Offender Residency Restrictions

One of the most disturbing trends in how the law and courts handle sex offenders that are on probation/parole or otherwise complete their incarceration is the concept of "residency restrictions." It's a somewhat lofty term, but it boils down to a simple meaning: sex offenders are not allowed to live within a specific distance from certain types of locations. The concept of preventing sex offenders from residing "near" one of these "safe zones" may be the most dangerous developments coming to a state, county, or town near you. Are you concerned about a sex offender living near your child's school? If you're a parent, you're likely to accept anything that's handed to you in the name of keeping your children safe and helping them grow up right, but it is the unwritten "fine print" on such things as residency restriction laws that actually endangers your child. Let's examine these new restrictions that are being enacted across the country to see if the objectives written on the front of said laws are equal to the actual effects of the laws.
The premise for residency restriction comes across not unlike a very tasty meal. Sex offenders are people who have committed a crime that has some kind of sexual element involved (for example, streaking is a sex offense in some jurisdictions because it involves exposure of the genitals). Unfortunately, all "sex offenders" are typically referred to as one category and synonymized with far worse terminology such as "child predators" and "baby rapers." Sex offenders, who are often thought of as "child predators" regardless of the specifics of each individual case, are considered by most typical law-abiding citizens to be an "unwanted element" of society. In general, no one wants anyone else near them or their family members that is not guaranteed to be a decent, upstanding, law-abiding individual, and any ex-con falls out of that comfort zone. Two factors make sex offenders stand out over other ex-cons and subject them to additional discrimination and segregation desire: the crime was of a sexual nature (often referred to as "violation" of another), and sex offenders have all of their personal information plastered all over the place for anyone to see, with complete disregard for the offender's rights or safety. Increased public awareness, media hype, and availability of information on sex offenders has scared the living crap out of many a parent who didn't realize that there was a sex offender down the street (because the offender didn't bother their family in the first place, right?)
The trend in modern societies toward lazy parenting, living in fear of the neighbors, and trusting what is heard rather than coming to one's own conclusions drives these now paranoid families to ask the government why it "allows" a person with a sex-related conviction to live anywhere near them or their children. So powerful is the fear of a lazy parent for their child that they will stop at nothing to prevent these "evil elements" from coming within a thousand miles of their kids. Nothing done to the convicted sex offender is too harsh or cruel, as long as it keeps the children safe.
Remember the tasty meal I mentioned? Here's where dinner is served: a vote-begging politician decides to take advantage of the fear of these lazy parents by promising to "get tough on sex offenders" and "protect the children from these ruthless predators." You vote for this guy, hoping he will live up to what he says. How does he make sure that you know he is out there crusading to protect your kids? Simple! Introduce a bill that proposes "taping off" sex offenders from living inside a certain radius around key locations that your child spends most of his or her life. The goal of this bill, obviously, is to protect your child from being sexually assaulted. To reach this goal, the idea is that sexual predators won't be able to live near a place where children frequent. That's the only positive point: predators would LEGALLY be unable to live nearby, which is secondary to the real point--to get your vote next time around. Let's examine the negatives in a little depth and realize why these restrictions are the worst thing to happen to your childrens' safety in a long time.
  • Promotion of a False Sense of Security - Designating any given area as a "safe zone" implies that those areas will be free from danger, and also implies that other areas will be more dangerous. This is far from the truth. If a sex offender were to reoffend, nothing written in a law book is going to prevent them from walking, riding, or driving down to a "safe zone" and reoffend. More dangerous than this is the fact that the majority of new sex crimes are committed by people who are unregistered, and therefore have none of these restrictions. People let down their guard when they feel safe, and that actually endangers your children more, because the warning signs of criminal intent will be ignored; after all, it's a SAFE ZONE! There are NO PREDATORS in a SAFE ZONE!...and that could be a fatal assumption.
  • Increased Stress Promotes Recidivism - Sex offenders have a very hard time rebuilding their lives, much harder than other categories of criminals. Their presence is known to all, and they suffer illegal harassment, abuse, threats, denial of housing and employment, and a host of other things, all because of their past that they are trying to learn from and leave behind. As if things weren't bad enough, these "can't live within X feet" restrictions significantly reduce housing availability to a class of people that already suffers from housing denial and ineligibility to ask for help from government-assisted housing projects. Worse yet, if an offender is in the pre-defined range BEFORE the law takes effect, the law will often be used to force that person to relocate, with no regard for how long they have lived there or how well they are doing with rebuilding their lives. This uprooting of offenders that are stabilizing their lives puts extreme and unjustifiable stress on the offender, "just because." It has been proven in numerous studies and through the testimony of many qualified sex offender treatment psychiatrists that increasing stresses on sex offenders increases the chance of reoffense. These laws unfairly damage offenders' lives, thus making your child less safe.
  • Residency Restriction Banishes and Concentrates Sex Offenders - I have included maps at the bottom of the page to demonstrate how increasingly large restrictions on where sex offenders can live relative to other places can effectively banish sex offenders from entire cities, or at least concentrate them into certain places where they are closer together. If the places that are outside of the restriction areas refuse to rent or sell to sex offenders, this would also banish them from the city entirely. Housing problems created by ever-increasing residency restriction laws increase the stress on sex offenders, and re-read the last point if you don't understand why this is dangerous to your child. Why do this to people who have returned to being law-abiding citizens?
  • Using Legal "Safe Zones" Instead of Residency Restrictions is Equally Bad - There are some places that recommend establishing actual "safe zones" where a sex offender could be arrested if the offender enters that area. This is often proposed as an alternative to residency restrictions, but remember what I said earlier? Laws in a law book don't stop people from going places if they want to go there. Laws against something do not stop that something from happening. Laws only allow fines, imprisonment, prosecution, and other legal remedies after that act has been committed. Also, remember that most new sex offenses are first-time offenses by unregistered persons that "safe zones" wouldn't prohibit in the first place. This type of law will do nothing to prevent sex offenses from being committed, but it will certainly prevent sex offenders that have families from taking their children to school, church, parks, public pools, and any other area that is legally "taped off."
  • Residency Restrictions Don't Address the REAL Problems - If you're a parent, get off the couch and teach your children how to recognize the warning signs of a potential molester. Drill into your children the concept of "safe touch." Teach children that someone who touches them in a certain place are doing a bad thing and that they need to tell someone immediately. Educate your children instead of begging a politician to raise your kids for you. Tell kids about sex and its purpose at an early age so that it is not a strange thing that they will want to try behind your back in their adolescence. In addition to teaching your children, you need to pressure politicians to address real problems in a way that will prevent new sex offenses from happening, rather than trying to punish the person AFTER they violate your child. Encourage politicians to make laws that explicitly prevent therapists and psychiatrists from reporting persons to law enforcement that seek help for their "bad thoughts!" If help is made available to potential future offenders to help them avoid acting on their urges, many new sex offenses will be prevented before they can happen. Unfortunately, this does not fit in with some child protection advocate groups' political agendas. Why? Ask the tough questions.
While the residency restriction and safe zone laws may make you feel like your children are safe, they're not. You only endanger your children by blindly allowing these things to be put into law, without questioning the actual effects of the law when it goes on the books. Common sense would destroy many of the laws on the books as they are written today, but we live in ignorant times. Take the time to educate yourself and your children.

80% SO's Innocent?

From: Angry Harry
Most 'Sex Offenders' Are Innocent

Hello Harry

One thing has been bugging for a couple of weeks now. It is this statement from your piece The Truth About the Truth

(And in the UK, for example, my own view is that something like 80% of all those men convicted of sexual crimes are either completely innocent, or their behaviour has been 'misjudged'.)

Where do you get this figure of 80%? Is it an official figure? Has some academic quoted this in research?

Please let me know before my mind bursts.

Regards

F (a long time fan)

Hello F

Well, actually, I conjured the figure out of my head - but I did say that this 80% figure was my view.

And I will tell you why I think that it is about right.

1. Those **imprisoned** for sex offences in the UK (guilty and innocent) tend to claim that at least half of their fellow inmates were not guilty of anything. And I believe them. Furthermore, I think that this 50% is probably a bottom line.

2. Many men are, indeed, guilty of what they were convicted for but, nevertheless, their behaviours, in my view, will have very often been misjudged. One good example of this is those men who have been found guilty of 'raping' underage girls when, in fact, they were their boyfriends. I quote the prison doctor Theodore Dalrymple ...

"In my experience from the prison in which I work, men who are charged with having sexual relations with underage adolescent girls are often reported to the police (and subsequently charged and imprisoned) not because they have had sex with these girls, but because they have stopped having sex with these girls: and hell hath no fury like an adolescent girl scorned."

Another example would be that postman who was charged with 'sexual assault and battery' merely for planting a kiss on a customer's cheek.

These men were not guilty of sexual assaults. Inappropriate conduct, maybe; but not sexual assaults.

3. We **know** that many law enforcement officers will attempt to prosecute - often successfully - men whom they even know to be innocent e.g. the Duke Three in the USA, and Warren Blackwell here in the UK. This not only suggests to me that many innocent men are prosecuted for the most disgusting of reasons, but it also suggests to me that there are not enough real bona fide sexual offenders to prosecute.

4. Men are often convicted without **any** objective evidence standing against them; just the testimony of a vengeful lying woman.

5. I am almost certain that AT LEAST 85% of sex-assault **allegations** made to the police are false, and I actually believe the figure is over 90%; e.g. see Rape Baloney2.

6. I do not believe that **viewing** illicit material is a 'sexual' offence (any more than viewing a picture of a bomb explosion is a 'violent' offence). I do accept that certain material should be illegal to view, but this does not mean that viewing such material should be considered to be a 'sexual offence'..

7. Men who are imprisoned for sexual offences can have their sentences halved if, once in prison, they admit to their guilt, and many men are very seriously threatened by the police if they do not admit to their guilt when it comes to sexual offences. As such, many men who do admit to their guilt in this area are not guilty at all.

All in all, therefore, my guess is that around 80% of men who have been convicted of ****sexual**** crimes are either innocent of such **sexual** crimes and/or their behaviours have either been misjudged or dishonestly 'categorised'; and, with regard to the latter, many 'sexual' harassment cases also come to mind.

In a nutshell; two things seem to be happening.

Firstly, crimes are very often deemed to be sexual when, in fact, there was no real crime and/or when there was, in fact, no actual sex - of any sort.

Secondly, the justice system has been corrupted through and through with feminist-inspired man-hating ideology. The system is completely untrustworthy when it comes to 'relationship' issues. And it is absolutely clear that prosecutors, politicians and government officials are forever bending over backwards to convict as many men as possible regardless of the evidence and, indeed, regardless of the truth about the alleged impact on the alleged victims.

(In America, they do this often just to get votes. And even a man caught urinating in the street can be put on the sex-offenders list.)

And one can add to all this the fact that in the vast majority of these cases, whatever it was that was actually done - if anything - would have been trivial; because, as in most other areas of human behaviour, extreme things happen relatively rarely. In other words, most of this sexual stuff is nothing more than froth and bubble. But, as typically happens nowadays, the feminists and the abuse industry pump everything up, so that everything to do with the 'abuse of women' sounds a hundred times worse than it actually is.

An attempted kiss is 'sexual battery'!

But this is the bread and butter of the sex assault industry. It is where most of the court cases come from. But, of course, they do not hit the headlines - even though they ruin lives.

And when you push into your consciousness this huge - and largely hidden - number of cases that are trivial, miscategorised or misjudged, and stop focussing on the big cases that hit the headlines, it is not very difficult to believe that very many men are being entrapped by a corrupt system that is actually **designed** to entrap them - with, further, huge encouragements being given to women to make false allegations, and for men to admit to things that they have not actually done.

In summary; it seems highly plausible to me that 80% of those men who are officially pronounced to be guilty of sexual crimes are not, in any reasonable sense of the term, 'sex offenders'.

Finally, one thing that also strikes me about the majority of men who have been convicted for breaking sexual laws of one form or another is the fact that they clearly had no intention to cause anyone any harm. On the contrary, they were mostly hoping to achieve the opposite. And, in my view, this makes hell of a difference to how they should be viewed. Unfortunately, however, the truth behind such issues is completely swamped by the huge forces that are forever seeking to demonise men.

The prosecution of that postman for 'sexual assault and battery' when all he did was kiss a woman on the cheek says a great deal about what is really going on out there.

Best wishes

Harry

What You Need to Know about Polygraphs

From: http://antipolygraph.org/

Did you know:

Friday, March 2, 2012

Occupy Movement Hits San Quentin

 from: http://www.sfbg.com/politics/2012/02/22/occupy-4-prisoners-hits-san-quentin

 Occupy 4 Prisoners hits San Quentin

|

The crowd marches at Occupy San Quentin
IMAGE VIA KRISSANA LIMLAMAI FOR OCCUPYSF MEDIA

About 800 protesters marched to San Quentin’s East Gate in a day to protest what they called inhumane conditions in prison Feb. 20
Protesters called for an end to the practice of trying children as adults, three strikes laws, life sentences, life without the possibility of parole, and the death penalty.They did not call for the dismantling of the prison system or an end to the practice of incarceration, as Chip Johnson implies here.
In San Quentin-- and in prisons across the country—inmates are subjected to solitary confinement, sometimes for decades. Kids as young as 13 are tried as adults and sometimes sentenced to life without the possibility of parole. In three-strikes states, people are sentenced to decades in prison for non-violent crimes that sometimes amount to less than a couple hundred dollars in damages. And in death penalty states, state-sponsored execution means that lives, sometimes innocent, are thrown away.
Twenty-four US states do not have three strikes laws, many countries cap prison sentences at 15 years regardless of the severity of the crime, and only one European country- Belarus- continues to impose the death penalty. The United States incarcerates its citizens at a rate that far surpasses any other country in the world; second on the list in Rwanda.
Conditions and laws like these have spurred decades of prison reform and prison abolition activism, both from inmates and supporters on the outside. Feb. 20, this movement joined with Occupy Oakland to protest outside San Quentin prison and demand that these issues be addressed.
As protesters arrived, organizers blasted music, hoping to reach the ears of prisoners. Dozens of prison guards and representatives from the Marin County sheriff’s department were stationed in front of the prison gate, and well as on hills looking down on the protest group.
The loud music continued with a performance from the Brass Liberation Orchestra, and subsequently a drumming ritual.
“As First Nations people, we’re no strangers to occupation. We’re also no strangers to prison. The first prisons were the reservation and the slave plantation,” said George Galvis, Executive Director of Communities United for Restorative Youth Justice.
“We have post-colonial stress disorder in our communities,” added Galvis.
Author, film producer (Redemption: The Stan Tookie Williams Story) and 2006 California gubernatorial candidate Barbara Becnel helped facilitate the event.
In her opening statements, Becnel praised the crowd, packed with Occupy activists, family members of incarcerated people, formerly incarcerated people, and others.
“We should really be proud of ourselves today. Because today, we are history makers. We have merged the prison rights movement with the Occupy movement,” said Becnel to an eruption of applause.
Throughout the program, speakers read solidarity statements addressed to Occupy Oakland from prisoners across the country, including Mumia Abu Jamal, Leanard Peltier, Kevin Cooper, and group statements from Pelican Bay human rights organizers, and those involved in state-wide prison strikes in Georgia.
A movement has coalesced around the claim that Cooper, a death row inmate at San Quentin since 1985, is innocent. Cooper was denied an appeal in 2009 in a ninth-circuit court case in which five judges dissented, declaring that, “the state of California may be about to execute an innocent man.” Their 103-page dissent statement includes descriptions of evidence tampering leading to Cooper’s conviction.
Cooper helped call for the Occupy 4 Prisoners day of action.
Speakers at the rally called for Cooper’s freedom, and for the end of death row entirely.
Becnel related a story about some prisoners, charged with life without the possibility of parole, that she had met while campaigning against the death sentence for Stan "Tookie" Williams.
The men, Becnel said, told her: "We only leave here in a casket also. We are also dead men walking."
Speakers also decried the use of solitary confinement as a punishment in prisons.
Sarah Shourd, known for her imprisonment in Iran after accidentally crossing the border during a hike, spoke along with fellow imprisoned hikers Josh Fattal and Shane Bauer.
Shourd, who was held in solitary confinement for 14 months, related her experiences.
“After just two months my mind began to slip. I would spend large portions of my day crouched down by a small slot in my door, listening for any sounds from the outside that might distract me from the sheer terror of my isolation.”
A statement from a Texas prisoner, read by an Occupy Wall Street organizer, also addressed solitary confinement.
“We tend to think of man as a collection of individuals, each complete in himself, who just happen to come together to satisfy certain needs. Actually, however, there is nothing distinctly human that can be exhibited by an individual in isolation,” said the philosophical letter.
The Pelican Bay Hunger Strike last year highlighted solitary confinement, and prisoners demanded an end to the practice, in which inmates are held in isolated rooms with no sunlight for 23 hours a day, often for years on end. Some inmates at Pelican Bay have been held in these conditions for over 30 years.
Organizers of the hunger strike called it off when the California Department of Corrections promised to investigate the issue, but started to strike again several months later when no changes had been made to any of the conditions that they were protesting.
Kelly Turner, 42, who was sentenced to 25 years to life for writing a bad check for $146.16 in 1997, was also placed in solitary confinement for one year. However, she focused her speech at the rally on California’s three strikes law, the legislation that turned what would have been a three-year sentence for forgery into a possible life sentence for Turner. Turner said she was lucky that good pro bono lawyers defended her, and would likely still be in prison had they not; she now owns her own business.
Turner, who advocates for Families to Amend California Three Strikes (FACTS), urged the crowd to vote for an initiative to amend the law that is slated to appear on the California ballot this November. 
In her speech, Turner described meeting women in the Central California Women’s Facility is Chowchilla that were also serving decades-long sentences after having been charged with a third strike.
“I am here today for the woman that was on my dorm that had 27 years to life for drinking a 99 cent lemon line soda out of a store. Or the woman who stole a jar of Vaseline, a bottle of vitamins, two pairs of boxers,” said Turner.
Tatiana, a young prisoners rights advocate who spent time in juvenile hall, read a statement from incarcerated youth Veronica Hernandez.
Hernandez, 20, has been imprisoned since age 16.
She was tried as an adult, an outcome that she attributes to a public defender who did not do his best to fight for her.
"There are no law libraries or legal services at juvenile hall, so a juvenile, for better or for worse, is entirely dependent on his or her court-appointed attorney, and must trust that he or she will lead them in the right direction. Unfortunately for me, that direction was to adult court. I now face a life sentence should I be convicted," said Hernandez in her statement.
No speaker argued for the dismantling of the prison system, instead focusing on what they saw as unjust sentencing and inhumane treatment in prisons.
In a statement calling for Occupy 4 Prisoners, Kevin Cooper connected a call to end the death penalty with struggle for correct racial and economic justice and an end police brutality:
“America has a deep-seeded philosophy in which it only allows for the execution of its poorest people. These seeds have taken root and have grown in such a way that no person who this system sees as a ‘have-not’ is safe from the death machine. Whether they are within (San Quentin) or on a BART platform.”
Bauer also expressed the importance of tying prison rights to the Occupy movement, saying, “This Occupy movement needs to permeate the prisons. God forbid one day some people here will be on the other side of this fence. But when movements get strong, people start getting locked up. We should know this. This happens in every country. Prisons are places where movements are killed. But at the same time, when movements successfully permeate prisons, a space built to break people down, the movement is at its strongest. This is true all over the world.”
Occupy Oakland organizers have already been hit with bizarre and seemingly invalid charges, such as “lyching,” “bike,” “boat,” and umbrella. In one of the most extreme cases, Khali, an Occupy Oakland protester, may face life in prison after being arrested for a allegedly taking a blanket out of a garbage can. Advocates for Khali say that he was denied prescription medications in jail for ten days before allegedly assaulting a police officer; his third strike.
Well-known prison rights advocate and former Black Panther Elaine Brown ended the program. After remarking that “there aren’t enough songs in this movement,” she sang Oh, Freedom as the crowd peacefully exited the site, as several volunteers picked up any trash that was left behind.
“Before I’ll be a slave, I’ll be buried in my grave, and go home to my comrades and be free,” sang Brown.

Wednesday, February 29, 2012

Links for Information About False Accusations

The False Rape Society community of the wrongly accused

Links: Information About False Rape Claims


Seal Beach, CA Bans SO's From Beach

From: http://www.ocregister.com/news/law-342254-county-offenders.html

Seal Beach OKs sex offender ban for beach, pier and parks

By ROXANA KOPETMAN / THE ORANGE COUNTY REGISTER
SEAL BEACH – Sex offenders will be banned from this town's beaches, parks, jetties, pier and the adjacent parking lots under a new law given initial approval Monday night.
"We're sticking up for the kids," said Orange County District Attorney Tony Rackauckas, urging the City Council to approve the ban that is modeled on a similar county law.The Seal Beach City Council voted 5-0, without any discussion, to approve the law.(On Monday, Cypress relegates registered sex offenders to a particular part of the city.)
If adopted at the next meeting, Seal Beach would join a growing number of Orange County cities that have created similar laws targeting sexual predators. They include Huntington Beach, Irvine, La Habra, Laguna Hills, Lake Forest, Los Alamitos, Mission Viejo, Rancho Santa Margarita, Westminster, Yorba Linda and the county itself.
Fullerton was the first city in Orange County to bar sex offenders from loitering within 300 feet of parks, schools and daycare centers. County Supervisor Shawn Nelson and Rackauckas last April crafted the county law barring registered sex offenders from county parks, harbors, historic sites and beaches. Some of the city ordinances are modeled after the county's law but vary from it. Irvine, for example, passed a narrower version focusing on offenders who victimize minors.
The laws have been criticized as overly broad, unconstitutional and difficult to enforce.
In Seal Beach, there are 10 registered sex offenders, according to a staff report. Seven of the 10 live in the retired senior community of Leisure World, one lives in College Park East neighborhood and another one lives in the Hill neighborhood, north of PCH. The 10th offender is registered in the Oakwood Apartments but he no longer resides there, according to the staff report.
Called a "child safety zone," the new law would make it a misdemeanor for registered sex offenders to enter recreational areas where children gather. A first conviction would lead to a maximum of six months in jail or a fine up to $500 or both.
California has a number of measures to protect children from sexual predators, who are required to register their addresses with law enforcement.
The laws include: Jessica's Law, a 2006 voter-approved act that requires, among other things, all registered felony sex offenders to be monitored by a GPS device while on parole and bans them from residing within 2,000 feet of any school or park where children regularly gather; Senate Bill 1128, a 2006 law that prohibits sex offenders from entering school grounds without written permission; Chelsea's Law, a 2010 law that includes increases in penalties, parole provisions and oversight for offenders who have attacked children.
The general public can access a sex offender database, with the addresses of registered sex offenders, at meganslaw.ca.gov.
Contact the writer: rkopetman@ocregister.com

CA Hunger Striker Dies

From: http://www.democracynow.org/2012/2/24/death_of_hunger_striking_california_prisoner

Death of Hunger-Striking California Prisoner Sparks New Outrage over Inmates’ Suffering

Prison
Questions are mounting over the state of California’s prison system following the death of a hunger-striking inmate protesting conditions behind bars. Christian Gomez, 27, died at Corcoran State Prison, just six days after he and about 30 fellow prisoners began refusing food. Gomez was one of thousands of California inmates who have staged hunger strikes in 12 prisons since July after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that California prison overcrowding was causing "needless suffering and death" and ordered the state to reduce its number of prisoners. We speak with Gomez’s sister Yajaira Lopez and to attorney Carol Strickland of the Prisoner Hunger Strike Solidarity Coalition. "When he did get [to Corcoran State Prison], he did explain to us that he was participating in a hunger strike," Lopez says. "They were fighting for just fair treatment." [includes rush transcript]
Guests:
Yajaira Lopez, the older sister of Christian Gomez, a 27-year-old man who died while on a hunger strike at the Corcoran State Prison in California. Gomez died six days after he and 31 other inmates in the prison’s Administrative Segregation Unit began refusing food to protest restrictions on access to adequate healthcare, nutritious food, and legal services.
Carol Strickman, staff attorney at Legal Services for Prisoners with Children and a member of the Prisoner Hunger Strike Solidarity Coalition.

Tuesday, February 28, 2012

Protective Custody (SNY) Flooded with Gangs in CA

    I pussed out of the Mainline in CA Prisons after spending 15 years there and it was one of the best decisions in my life. Mainlines in CA Prisons can be extremely dangerous. I was scared shitless a number of times over the years and sweated it out daily that my jacket had a sex beef on it. Very, very risky. On my one and only PC (they call them Sensitive Needs Yards now) yard I was surprised to see gangs there. I thought a guy went PC to get away from all that crap. Fucking morons. I spent a year and a half in PC and never had any trouble there like I did on the Mainline, but the gangs did fuck with other guys. I hear in the wind that PC is going to be the new Mainline and everybody in General Population will be locked down. I also hear that CA is going to make some yards just for SO's. Who knows? I don't think even CDCR knows. Anyway, here's a link to a Fox News report on CA's PC Gangs :

http://www.myfoxla.com/dpp/news/investigative/prison-sny-gangs-part-2-2012-02-20#ixzz1n4Ux8dSc

Facebook Ban Raises Questions

From: The Advocate - http://theadvocate.com/columnists/2153243-55/facebook-ban-raises-questionson-punishment.html

Facebook ban raises questions on punishment
Sex offenders are an easy set of criminals to condemn. Their offenses are reprehensible. Politicians can get a lot of mileage out of seeming tough on crime when they load up their sentencing requirements.
But when does the list of penalties become too outrageous? Do lawmakers and the governor believe sex offenders can’t be rehabilitated? Can someone have served his time and move on, or because it is a sex offense, is that impossible?
A recent legal argument over sex offenders is raising those questions.
A federal judge this month threw out a Louisiana law banning certain sex offenders from Facebook and other social networking sites, saying it was an unreasonable restriction on constitutionally protected speech that could keep them off the Internet entirely.
The law, which took effect in August, made it a crime for anyone convicted of a sex offense against a minor or of video voyeurism to use networking websites, chat rooms and peer-to-peer networks.
Gov. Bobby Jindal and lawmakers said the ban was designed to keep sex offenders from seeking out children in online forums.
“The Internet is the virtual playground where sex offenders are trying to strike and prey on our kids. We must have the tools to crack down on monsters that are preying on our kids,” Jindal said in a statement.
The law, according to U.S. District Judge Brian Jackson, also could bar the offenders — including those who have served their time in prison and on parole — from reading news websites, searching for jobs online and working in positions that involved the Internet.
That type of isolation could make it impossible to re-enter society.
Jackson said the prohibition went too far, infringing on constitutional rights.
“Although the act is intended to promote the legitimate and compelling state interest of protecting minors from Internet predators, the near total ban on Internet access imposed by the act unreasonably restricts many ordinary activities that have become important to everyday life in today’s world,” Jackson wrote in his ruling.
During a hearing a few months before his ruling, Jackson noted the statute would appear to ban the sex offenders from even using the federal court website.
Conviction of the crime of unlawful use or access of social media carried a prison sentence of up to 10 years. A second conviction required a prison sentence of at least five years and up to 20 years.
The ACLU of Louisiana sought to overturn the law on behalf of two sex offenders identified as John Doe and James Doe. John Doe is from East Baton Rouge Parish and was convicted in 2002 of possessing child pornography. James Doe is from Iberia Parish and pleaded guilty in another state to having a sexual encounter with a minor, according to court documents.
Jindal vowed to appeal Jackson’s ruling.
“Louisiana families should have the comfort of knowing their children are able to go online without the threat of sex predators. It’s offensive that the court would rule that the rights of sex predators are more important than the rights of innocent children,” the governor said.
In recent years, Jindal has made a crackdown on sex offenses among the centerpieces of his legislative agenda each year. He’s signed into law bills that allow for chemical castration of sex offenders, lengthened jail sentences and expanded monitoring and restrictions on where they can live and travel.
Lawmakers have gone along with nearly every proposal Jindal offered. They balked, however, on a measure to allow the confinement of sex offenders beyond their prison sentences, by involuntarily placing them in mental health facilities for treatment.
The Legislature will get a chance to revisit the Facebook ban in the upcoming session that begins March 12.
Melinda Deslatte covers state politics
for The Associated Press.

Monday, February 27, 2012

True Life - I'm a Sex Offender

One of the worse aspects of The Sex Crime Witch Hunt is how many young men are caught in the web of being a "Convicted Sex Offender" for having consensual sex with underage girls, especially 18-19 years olds who had sex with a gal 1-3 years younger. They were just "kids" themselves. These are called Romero and Juliet romances. Below is a link to MTV's documentary about 2 such young men called "True Life - I'm a Sex Offender". You won't believe what these 2 are forced to go thru.

http://www.mtv.com/videos/true-life-im-a-sex-offender/1677462/playlist.jhtml#series=2211&seriesId=5232&channelId=1

Sunday, February 26, 2012

Louisiana Judge Strikes Down Internet Ban for RSO's

Louisiana Judge strikes down law that bans SO's from social internet sites. Way to go ! I still can't believe that CA is thinking about banning RSO's from not only social internet sites, but the internet all together. Pure insanity. Read more about LA's ban being shot down at :

http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2012/02/17/judge-strikes-down-law-banning-sex-offenders-from-facebook/

Germany and Castration of Sex Offenders

Germany urged to halt castration of sex offenders
 

STRASBOURG | Wed Feb 22, 2012 10:18am EST
STRASBOURG (Reuters) - Germany should stop the "degrading" practice of surgically castrating sex offenders, the anti-torture panel at Europe's top human rights watchdog said on Wednesday.Under German law, serious sex offenders can volunteer for the operation as part of their treatment.
The Strasbourg Council of Europe's anti-torture committee said the procedure was rare in Germany, with fewer than five cases a year over the past decade.
But surgical castration was mutilating and irreversible and there was no evidence it prevented men from committing new sex crimes, the committee said in a report on Germany.
"Surgical castration of detained sexual offenders could easily be considered as amounting to degrading treatment," said the report.
"Therefore, the Committee recommends that immediate steps be taken by the relevant authorities to discontinue in all German Laender (federal states) the application of surgical castration in the context of treatment of sexual offenders," it added.
The German government said in an official response to the report that the practice was under review but it believed there were medical grounds for continuing to offer the operation.
Under German regulations, a sex offender can be castrated if he ask for the procedure, is older than 25 and gets the approval of a panel of experts.
The Czech Republic is the only other European country to allow sexual offenders to choose surgical castration. The committee's report on Wednesday only focused on the situation in Germany.
A less invasive chemical procedure, that blocks the creation of testosterone, is a mandatory treatment for offenders in some U.S. states and in Poland.
Other countries let sex criminals choose this form of chemical castration.
(Reporting by Gilbert Reilhac; Additional reporting and writing by Leigh Thomas; Editing by Andrew Heavens)

I Love a Sex Offender

From: http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL992949EC72D99A4D

Welcome to the world of someone whose life partner has been labeled with arguably the worst possible title imaginable: sex offender. I aim to engage and support others who …
  1. 1Thumbnail
4:53Thumbnail
Visit her blog: http://www.iloveasexoffender.blogspot.comWatched Part 1: My Hero, Your Sex Offenderby SOSupporter856 views
  2. 2Thumbnail
11:07Thumbnail
Visit her blog: http://www.iloveasexoffender.blogspot.comWatched Part 2: The Childhood and Trial of a Sex Offenderby SOSupporter552 views
  3. 3Thumbnail
14:46Thumbnail
Visit her blog: http://www.iloveasexoffender.blogspot.comWatched Part 3: 18-Year-Old Sex Offender Goes to Jailby SOSupporter1,235 views

Saturday, February 25, 2012

CDCR's Sex Offender Information

Sex Offender Information Overview

GPS Monitor being recharged.
California leads the nation in tracking sex offenders with Global Positioning Technology. California has more than 6,600 sex offenders equipped with GPS (all active sex offender parolee in the community) California's total GPS units more than triples the nation's second leading state, Florida which has a total of 1,800 units.
3 min video video >
Click to view Latest Jessica's Law Statistics
Since the passage of Jessica's Law in 2006, the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) has been working to aggressively enforce new residency restrictions, and to utilize new technology - such as Global Positioning System (GPS) - to monitor sex offenders more closely and efficiently. California's parole division has made it a priority to work with local law enforcement to implement Jessica's Law, better monitor sex offenders released from prison and ensure public safety.
Of the almost 92,000 sex offenders statewide, CDCR is only responsible for a little more than 11% (10,781).
This site is dedicated to providing the latest news and information on sex offenders as well as information on collaborative efforts between CDCR and other agencies dedicated to protecting public safety.
CDCR Strictly enforces Jessica's Law to keep sex offenders who are on parole from living within 2,000 feet of schools and parks.

Jessica's Law vs Megan's Law

With the highest population of sex offenders in the nation, California has enacted historic new laws pertaining to sex offenders. However, there still remains much confusion on the intent and purposes of these new laws. The recent passage of Jessica's Law has often been confused with a separate law known as Megan's Law. Here are some quick facts which may help in distinguishing these two landmark measures:
click for Jessica's Law Statistics
Jessica's Law deals with proximity and tracking - Proposition 83, also known as Jessica's Law, was passed by California voters on Nov. 7, 2006. It enhances the state's ability to detect, track and apprehend sexual offenders. Jessica's Law prohibits sex offenders that are released from prison to live within 2,000 feet of parks and schools, as well as other restrictions. Click here to learn more about Jessica's Law
Megan's Law addresses registration requirements - Expanded access was given final passage by the Legislature on August 24, 2004 was signed by the Governor on Sept. 24, 2004. The law allowed the public to access information on sex offenders required to register with local law enforcement. Click here to get more information on Megan's Law and to access the state database
View Sex Offender Safety Tips

How GPS Monitoring Works

How GPS Monitoring Works

GPS around a globeGlobal Positioning System (GPS) monitoring works due to the triangulation of satellites orbiting the earth. Twenty-four satellites are used in all.
To "triangulate" means that a GPS receiver measures distance using the travel time of radio signals. When a user's GPS ankle unit reads the signals sent to it by the satellites, these signals can provide information as to the wearer's location, speed of movement and direction of movement.


GPS basic system

Active VS Passive GPS Measuring

GPS deviceActive GPS transmits its location at near real-time intervals and can include immediate alert notifications.
Passive GPS transmits its location at set intervals and alert notifications are usually received the next day.

Use of GPS Data

GPS overall system

Stockton Evicts Homeless RSO's at Shanty Town

Parole agents rush to keep track of sex offenders after campsite eviction
Written by
Leigh Paynter for http://www.news10.net/

STOCKTON, CA - The Stockton city government had a highly publicized eviction of homeless squatters at a shanty town down in Mormon Slough last week.
However, further down the Slough, by Jefferson and A Streets, a different campsite was quietly dismantled; it was the long time home to dozens of sex offenders.
"All of them, the 20 that were there, couldn't find housing that was compliant with Jessica's Law," California State Parole Delta District Administrator Julie Kaplan said. "Homeless shelters they can't go to, because they're family shelters with children and women. Some found businesses that gave them permission to stay on private property."
Kaplan said when transient sex offenders are evicted, the parole agents have to scramble to keep tabs on them.
The California State Parole District in Stockton currently has 20 transient registered sex offenders under its watch. San Joaquin County Probation Department has seven homeless sex offenders. Both agencies track sex offenders with GPS ankle bracelets.
"We get five minute increments on a map that show exactly where that offender has been," SJC Probation Department Assist. Chief Stephanie James said. "We can also set up exclusion or inclusion zones and if the offender steps somewhere where he shouldn't be, his agent is notified immediately."
One homeless registered sex offender said the GPS device must kept charged.
"We're tracked. A computer tells them exactly where we're at and it sets off an alarm if you're violating," said the offender, who wished to remain anonymous.
Kaplan said a week after the city's eviction of Mormon Slough, many of the 20 registered sex offenders are now back at Mormon Slough. The campsite now sits further out of view from the above neighborhood on A Street.
"They let their parole agents know they were moving back or near that area," Kaplan said.
On Wednesday afternoon, a homeless sex offender registered at the probation department that he was now staying in Mormon Slough.
"We did verify that this morning that he was in fact at Mormon Slough yesterday," James said.
James had no probationary sex offenders staying in Mormon Slough prior to the city eviction last week.
While law enforcement agencies know where homeless sex offenders are at all times, citizens do not. The state sex offender online registry does not list the last known location of transient sex offenders.
"It's unnerving, because you don't know who's down there or how many," said a mother living in the neighborhood above Mormon Slough.
"We went down there to play on dirt bikes and saw a lot of tents," said 17-year-old Tracey Jenkins.
Jenkins found out sex offenders were living below her neighborhood after she and her friends stumbled onto their camp.
"Now I can't go anywhere by myself and I stay away from there. It freaks me out," Jenkins said.
A few neighbors in the neighborhood above Mormon Slough said they still feel safe in their neighborhood despite the sex offender campsite.
"They keep to themselves mostly," one mother said. "If they keep a good eye on them, then it's fine."
Homeless sex offenders on parole must register every 30 days at the nearest police station. Those on county probation report to their parole agent every Wednesday.

Sex Offender ID Cards in CA ?

   You have got to be kidding me. Special ID cards for the almost 100,000 RSO's in CA ? The hysteria seems to get worse and worse. Of course the RSO will have to flip the bill, but with so many RSO's driven into homelessness due to Jessica's Law CA tax payers will have pay for it. I can't see The State forcing all RSOs to carry Special ID Cards, but I never thought I'd have a GPS Shackle locked onto my ankle either. What next? Arm bands? How exactly are these Sex Offender ID's going to keep anyone safer? This is just another scheme by some sleazy politician trying to get his name in the paper proposing a Bill that keeps no one safe, promotes fear, and costs the CA tax payers a bundle that is totally wasted. Read more about this proposed Bill at : http://www.kesq.com/news/30469085/detail.html

Monday, February 20, 2012

J.A. Out - Mr.X In

  J.A. has had to quit his activism due to his many problems dealing with California's Jessica's Law which makes completing parole almost impossible. J.A. has been in the fight against The Sex Crime Witch Hunt for over 20 years and will surely be missed. My name is Mr. X and I will be taking over for J.A. who has 20 months left on parole before he returns to Alaska. Good luck J.A. !