The Backlash! - December 1997
Organization News - Society Against False Accusations of Rape
James Donald Anderson #6952487
Oregon State Correctional Institution
3405 Deer Park Dr SE
Salem, OR 97301
An innocent man
An innocent man
Having served several years for a crime I never committed,
I refuse parole.
by James Donald Anderson, convicted rapist
Copyright © 1997 by James Donald Anderson
On April 10th, 1997, I am going to go in front of you to be judged again for a crime I did not commit. I have decided that to accept parole would be in conflict of my many years of proclaiming my innocence. I committed no crime to have all these years stolen out of my life and will not beg for parole. Being an innocent man, I refuse your parole offerings, which is my right under laws in effect at the time of supposed crime (September 5th, 1985). I will serve this prison term until my Good-Time Release Date at which time I will be released. See Bollinger vs. Board of Parole.
I have absolutely no remorse for the crime I was wrongly convicted of, I have not a shred of sympathy for my so-called victim, and I owe no one an apology for my actions. How can I have remorse, empathy, or apologize for something I did not do?
I realize my innocence means nothing to you and the fact I have served over six years in an Oregon prison for a crime I did not commit equally means nothing to you. I have come to realize that prisons and prisoners means more money for you and your kind. I refuse parole because I want nothing more to do with the "Corrections" industry in Oregon.
The woman who falsely accused me of rape on September 5th, 1985, did so in order to file a million dollar lawsuit, and because she is mentally ill with a history of falsely accusing men of sex crimes. I was wrongly convicted because vital evidence about my accuser's past and her motives were not allowed in the courtroom due to unconstitutional Rape Shield Laws that hide important evidence from juries in rape trials. And because rape crisis counselors in Salem, Oregon, gave her acting lessons and coached her how to appear as a real rape victim on the witness stand. My accuser,Donna Jean Rowland, of Albany, Oregon, was awarded $24,000.00 for her lies. Because I am not what you call a "sex offender" I will also be filing a lawsuit so I will not be forced to register as a "sex offender" once I am released from prison. I believe over six years out of my life is enough for the state of Oregon and I will not give up my privacy and dignity by being forced to register as a "sex offender." I believe these sex offender community notification laws are unconstitutional and a form of double jeopardy. I will not take part in this further injustice.
I will also not take part in any "sex offender" treatment programs or any other behavior modification classes. As I have stated, I am not a sex offender and was wrongly convicted of Rape because my so-called fair trial was rigged to ensure a conviction. Why should I subject myself to "sex offender" treatment? So some sex offender counselor can justify his job? Would it not be a waste of time for not only myself but also for Oregon's sex offender treatment industry, for me to partake in a "treatment" I do not need or want?
In 1990, another Oregon Parole Board said I should serve four years in prison for my so-called crime and be released. They stated for the record that:
I refuse parole.
by James Donald Anderson, convicted rapist
Copyright © 1997 by James Donald Anderson
On April 10th, 1997, I am going to go in front of you to be judged again for a crime I did not commit. I have decided that to accept parole would be in conflict of my many years of proclaiming my innocence. I committed no crime to have all these years stolen out of my life and will not beg for parole. Being an innocent man, I refuse your parole offerings, which is my right under laws in effect at the time of supposed crime (September 5th, 1985). I will serve this prison term until my Good-Time Release Date at which time I will be released. See Bollinger vs. Board of Parole.
I have absolutely no remorse for the crime I was wrongly convicted of, I have not a shred of sympathy for my so-called victim, and I owe no one an apology for my actions. How can I have remorse, empathy, or apologize for something I did not do?
I realize my innocence means nothing to you and the fact I have served over six years in an Oregon prison for a crime I did not commit equally means nothing to you. I have come to realize that prisons and prisoners means more money for you and your kind. I refuse parole because I want nothing more to do with the "Corrections" industry in Oregon.
The woman who falsely accused me of rape on September 5th, 1985, did so in order to file a million dollar lawsuit, and because she is mentally ill with a history of falsely accusing men of sex crimes. I was wrongly convicted because vital evidence about my accuser's past and her motives were not allowed in the courtroom due to unconstitutional Rape Shield Laws that hide important evidence from juries in rape trials. And because rape crisis counselors in Salem, Oregon, gave her acting lessons and coached her how to appear as a real rape victim on the witness stand. My accuser,Donna Jean Rowland, of Albany, Oregon, was awarded $24,000.00 for her lies. Because I am not what you call a "sex offender" I will also be filing a lawsuit so I will not be forced to register as a "sex offender" once I am released from prison. I believe over six years out of my life is enough for the state of Oregon and I will not give up my privacy and dignity by being forced to register as a "sex offender." I believe these sex offender community notification laws are unconstitutional and a form of double jeopardy. I will not take part in this further injustice.
I will also not take part in any "sex offender" treatment programs or any other behavior modification classes. As I have stated, I am not a sex offender and was wrongly convicted of Rape because my so-called fair trial was rigged to ensure a conviction. Why should I subject myself to "sex offender" treatment? So some sex offender counselor can justify his job? Would it not be a waste of time for not only myself but also for Oregon's sex offender treatment industry, for me to partake in a "treatment" I do not need or want?
In 1990, another Oregon Parole Board said I should serve four years in prison for my so-called crime and be released. They stated for the record that:
- The "victim" was not harmed in any way.
- No threats were made at the "victim."
- The "crime" contained no violence.
- And Vern Faatz, the head of the Parole Board in 1990, said that the "victim" aided in the "crime."
- The "victim" was not harmed in any way.
- No threats were made at the "victim."
- The "crime" contained no violence.
- And Vern Faatz, the head of the Parole Board in 1990, said that the "victim" aided in the "crime."
No comments:
Post a Comment